The outcome of a project largely depends on the behavior of the manager as their actions will directly influence the behavior of the team. Even wh all the efforts, s may put forth to salvage a once posive work environment, at the core of every working environment is the bad manager. There are different types of managers, and each one has s own characteristics that determine how s will react, the working environment, and overall production. Five common types include:

1. Laissez-Faire

‘Laissez-Faire’, is French for leaving things to take their own course whout interference. These types of managers tend to leave subordinates to get on wh the work on their own and have ltle to no communication wh them. They fail to provide regular feedback when supervising. Though this form of management may seem irresponsible, requires a lot of trusts. Highly and capable s need very ltle interference, as they are trusted to do the task to the best of their abilies. However, when comes to s wh limed experience, this form of management means there will be low production value as these s feel they do not have to do any work due to the lack of authory they have over them. can also make these s a lot harder to control and since work is not being done, resources, , and time are wasted, which in turn increases the costs of .

2. Autocratic

This form of management is most suable for places such as the Army as gives the manager complete power. These types of managers make all the decisions wh very ltle or no input from the subordinates, and since they have total authory over them, s find hard to challenge the manager. This can create an atmosphere of fear and because of this qualy of work and production may increase, however, retention rates might increase along wh , as s may feel threatened and begin to resent their job. Nonetheless, this form of management might be suable for s who need close as they need to be told what to do and when, but creative s will find hard to work in an autocratic environment.

3. Participative

This type of manager values every member of the team and listens to whatever input s may have. However, the manager ultimately makes the final decision. This form of management will increase morale as s make contributions towards the decision-making process and they feel that their opinions matter. Wh this management style, the s easily accept changes in the company as they played a role in the process. As morale increases, production will increase along wh , making this a very effective management style.

4.

This management style is used to give out eher rewards or punishments to s depending on their performance. The manager along wh the s set goals together and agree on rewards or punishments depending on whether or not they reach their goal. The s then follow directions and instructions set by the managers in order to achieve the goal. The manager has the power to analyze the results of and eher give out rewards and praise the s or the s depending on the outcome.

5. Transformational

This type of management is used to increase the morale of the s and is normally used in suations where s feel discouraged. There are high levels of communication between the manager and the subordinates to reach their goals. These leaders motivate the s and enhance efficiency and production using communication. These types of managers delegate smaller tasks to smaller teams and on the big picture to achieve their overall goals.

Conclusion

There are many different types of managers, and some are used specifically to adapt to certain suations. Some management styles are more effective than others however depends on the type of s they are supervising, the task at hand, and the goals that are set.